NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR THE REFORM OF MARIJUANA LAWS
1001 CONNECTICUT AVENUE NW
T 202-483-5500 F
202-483-0057 E-MAIL NATLNORML@AOL.COM
. . . a weekly service for the media on news items related to Marijuana Prohibition.
April 10, 1997
Likely To Study Industrial Hemp
Other Bills Still Alive, Gaining Momentum In States
April 9, 1997, Richmond, VA: Virginia House
Agriculture Chairman Mitchell Van Yahres (D-Charlottesville) is
moving forward with plans to establish a joint subcommittee to
study the economic benefits of industrial hemp production despite
having faced opposition from the House Rules Committee. As
Agriculture Committee Chairman, Van Yahres has the authority to
appoint a commissioned study without legislative approval. Van
Yahres is currently trying to obtain funding for the study from
"There is more than a good chance this commissioned study will go forward," an aid to Van Yahres told NORML today.
"We are extremely pleased to see that Virginia has joined the growing number of states that are investigating industrial hemp," said local hemp activist and businessman Eric Steenstra. "Given the long history of hemp in Virginia and the fact that so many farmers here now depend on tobacco, growing hemp makes good sense. Farmers are struggling to make ends meet and we believe that hemp will be an excellent alternative to tobacco."
"Domestic sales of imported hemp products raked in approximately $25 million dollars in U.S. sales in 1994 alone and the American Farm Bureau now calls hemp 'one of the most promising crops in half a century,'" said NORML's Deputy Director Allen St. Pierre. "The explosion of industrial hemp legislation at the state level is a direct result of growing awareness among legislators and the public that this is a viable crop for American farmers."
Similar legislation requiring North Dakota State University to study the feasibility and durability of industrial hemp production was signed into law on March 23. Prior studies have been commissioned by state legislatures in Hawaii and Vermont.
Status of Industrial Hemp Legislation in Other States
The Senate Agriculture Committee introduced legislation on March
6 authorizing Iowa State University to conduct research on the
production and marketing of hemp. The bill now stands before the
Senate Appropriations Committee.
Senate Bill 340 explains that: "Industrial hemp historically has contributed to the economic welfare of this country, and is a renewable resource manufactured for textiles, pulp, paper, oil, and other products. The purpose of this act is to promote the economy of this state by providing for research necessary to develop industrial hemp as a viable crop." It further states that "research shall ... be determined by experimental trials when appropriate."
A companion bill introduced by Rep. Cecelia Burnett (D-Ames) was approved by the House Agriculture Committee on March 10 by a 18-3 vote, but later died in the House. Both measures were encouraged by the Iowa Farm Bureau Federation.
Senate Majority Leader Roger Moe (DFL-Erksine) introduced
legislation on March 10 that would classify industrial hemp as an
"agricultural product" and allow licensed farmers to
cultivate the crop for "commercial uses." The
Agriculture and Rural Development Committee approved the measure
on March 18 and the bill is now awaiting action by the full
Senate Bill 1181 states, "The legislature finds that the development and the use of industrial hemp is in the best interest of the state economy and agriculture and that the production of hemp is regulated so as not to interfere with the strict control of controlled substances in this state."
A companion bill also remains alive in the House of Representatives.
Sen. Jerry Howard (D-Dexter) pre-filed legislation in December to
allow the state's Department of Agriculture to license farmers to
grow hemp for industrial and research purposes. The Senate
"perfected" Senate Bill 79 on April 7 and attached an
emergency clause stating that: "Because of the immediate
need for the department of agriculture to authorize crop planting
for this growing season, this act shall be in full force and
effect upon its passage and approval."
The bill is expected to be a priority for the full Senate.
Rep. Floyd Prozansky (D-South Eugene) introduced legislation on
March 26 to allow licensed farmers to cultivate and possess hemp
for industrial purposes. The bill is awaiting action before the
House Judiciary Committee and a hearing is expected shortly.
"Rep. Prozansky has been laying the base for this measure for the last two years," an aid told NORML. She explained that the passage of this bill could be a first step in replacing Oregon's timber-based economy with one supported by industrial hemp production.
For more information, please contact Allen St. Pierre or Paul Armentano of NORML @ (202) 483-5500 or visit NORML's website at: http://www.norml.org.
Medical Marijuana Research Efforts
Moving Forward In
April 9, 1997, Washington, D.C.: A state
Senate committee approved legislation establishing a $6 million,
three-year research program at the University of California to
study the safety and efficacy of medical marijuana. The goal of
Senate Bill 535, sponsored by Sen. John Vasconcellos (D-Santa
Clara), is to determine a "safe and affordable" way to
distribute marijuana to doctors and patients whose physicians
approve it. The Senate Health and Human Services Committee passed
the bill on April 2 by a 5-2 vote.
"We owe it to the people of California to find out under what circumstances marijuana works as medicine," Vasconcellos said.
In Massachusetts, the Department of Public Health held bearings to determine proposed regulations to support an affirmative medical defense for certain medical marijuana patients and to develop a blueprint for a state-run medical research project. In addition, State Public Health Commissioner David Mulligan sent a letter to federal Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Donna Shalala requesting that the agency either provide the state with medical marijuana or permit it to grow its own. Gov. William Weld has publicly stated that he supports the current effort.
"The feds keep telling us verbally -- they have never put it in writing -- that they would supply [marijuana] for a well-designed clinical trial," said Nancy Ridley, assistant health commissioner. "We [have now sent] another batch of letters to the federal government to try to get them to be more specific about what it would take to access their supply. It would be absolutely wrong not to try."
In 1992, The Massachusetts Department of Health made a similar request to federal officials and was turned down.
For more information on state medical marijuana research efforts, please contact Allen St. Pierre or Paul Armentano of NORML @ (202) 483-5500.
MORE THAN 10 MILLION MARIJUANA ARRESTS SINCE 1965 . . . ANOTHER EVERY 54 SECONDS!